↓ Skip to main content

The effects of the winter of 1962/63 on the british marine fauna

Overview of attention for article published in Helgoland Marine Research, October 1964
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of the winter of 1962/63 on the british marine fauna
Published in
Helgoland Marine Research, October 1964
DOI 10.1007/bf01626116
Authors

Dennis J. Crisp

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Environmental Science 5 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,715,914
of 20,646,930 outputs
Outputs from Helgoland Marine Research
#76
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,413
of 347,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Helgoland Marine Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,646,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them