↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Carbohydrate Metabolism and Carbohydrate Loading

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Differences in Carbohydrate Metabolism and Carbohydrate Loading
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-3-1-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Wismann, Darryn Willoughby

Abstract

Prior to endurance competition, many endurance athletes participate in a carbohydrate loading regimen in order to help delay the onset of fatigue. The "classic" regimen generally includes an intense glycogen depleting training period of approximately two days followed by a glycogen loading period for 3-4 days, ingesting approximately 60-70% of total energy intake as carbohydrates, while the newer method does not consist of an intense glycogen depletion protocol. However, recent evidence has indicated that glycogen loading does not occur in the same manner for males and females, thus affecting performance. The scope of this literature review will include a brief description of the role of estradiol in relation to metabolism and gender differences seen in carbohydrate metabolism and loading.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 63 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,048,417
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#246
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,084
of 446,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#231
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.