↓ Skip to main content

Bringing scientific rigor to community-developed programs in Hong Kong

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bringing scientific rigor to community-developed programs in Hong Kong
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia S Fabrizio, Malia R Hirschmann, Tai Hing Lam, Teresa Cheung, Irene Pang, Sophia Chan, Sunita M Stewart

Abstract

This paper describes efforts to generate evidence for community-developed programs to enhance family relationships in the Chinese culture of Hong Kong, within the framework of community-based participatory research (CBPR).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Psychology 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,231,225
of 10,502,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,682
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,682
of 306,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#269
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,502,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.