You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bone mineral density and content during weight cycling in female rats: effects of dietary amylase-resistant starch
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-5-34 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John D Bogden, Francis W Kemp, Abigail E Huang, Sue A Shapses, Hasina Ambia-Sobhan, Sugeet Jagpal, Ian L Brown, Anne M Birkett |
Abstract |
Although there is considerable evidence for a loss of bone mass with weight loss, the few human studies on the relationship between weight cycling and bone mass or density have differing results. Further, very few studies assessed the role of dietary composition on bone mass during weight cycling. The primary objective of this study was to determine if a diet high in amylase-resistant starch (RS2), which has been shown to increase absorption and balance of dietary minerals, can prevent or reduce loss of bone mass during weight cycling. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 31% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#916
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,093
of 178,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.