You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-10-156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Scott Weich, John Powell, Sarah Stewart-Brown |
Abstract |
Mental well-being now features prominently in UK and international health policy. However, progress has been hampered by lack of valid measures that are responsive to change. The objective of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) at both the individual and group level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 309 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 14% |
Researcher | 40 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
Lecturer | 14 | 4% |
Other | 73 | 23% |
Unknown | 72 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 76 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 31 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
Unspecified | 11 | 4% |
Other | 49 | 16% |
Unknown | 88 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,896,290
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#910
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,208
of 288,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.