↓ Skip to main content

Physiological evaluation of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) immobilized with etorphine-xylazine-acepromazine in Northern Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological evaluation of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) immobilized with etorphine-xylazine-acepromazine in Northern Sweden
Published in
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1751-0147-54-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina L Evans, Åsa Fahlman, Göran Ericsson, Henning Andreas Haga, Jon M Arnemo

Abstract

Evaluation of physiology during capture and anesthesia of free-ranging wildlife is useful for determining the effect that capture methods have on both ecological research results and animal welfare. This study evaluates capture and anesthesia of moose (Alces alces) with etorphine-xylazine-acepromazine in Northern Sweden.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 42%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,028,788
of 4,508,238 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#166
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,709
of 283,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.