↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of name and address data for record linkage using hidden Markov models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparation of name and address data for record linkage using hidden Markov models
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2002
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-2-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Churches, Peter Christen, Kim Lim, Justin Xi Zhu

Abstract

Record linkage refers to the process of joining records that relate to the same entity or event in one or more data collections. In the absence of a shared, unique key, record linkage involves the comparison of ensembles of partially-identifying, non-unique data items between pairs of records. Data items with variable formats, such as names and addresses, need to be transformed and normalised in order to validly carry out these comparisons. Traditionally, deterministic rule-based data processing systems have been used to carry out this pre-processing, which is commonly referred to as "standardisation". This paper describes an alternative approach to standardisation, using a combination of lexicon-based tokenisation and probabilistic hidden Markov models (HMMs). HMMs were trained to standardise typical Australian name and address data drawn from a range of health data collections. The accuracy of the results was compared to that produced by rule-based systems. Training of HMMs was found to be quick and did not require any specialised skills. For addresses, HMMs produced equal or better standardisation accuracy than a widely-used rule-based system. However, accuracy was worse when used with simpler name data. Possible reasons for this poorer performance are discussed. Lexicon-based tokenisation and HMMs provide a viable and effort-effective alternative to rule-based systems for pre-processing more complex variably formatted data such as addresses. Further work is required to improve the performance of this approach with simpler data such as names. Software which implements the methods described in this paper is freely available under an open source license for other researchers to use and improve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 <1%
Student > Bachelor 2 <1%
Student > Master 2 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 193 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 4%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 196 93%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,292,402
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#147
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,279
of 131,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them