You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An informatics consult approach for generating clinical evidence for treatment decisions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-021-01638-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alvina G. Lai, Wai Hoong Chang, Constantinos A. Parisinos, Michail Katsoulis, Ruth M. Blackburn, Anoop D. Shah, Vincent Nguyen, Spiros Denaxas, George Davey Smith, Tom R. Gaunt, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Murray P. Cox, Donall Forde, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Steve Harris, Sylvia Richardson, Reecha Sofat, Richard J. B. Dobson, Aroon Hingorani, Riyaz Patel, Jonathan Sterne, Amitava Banerjee, Alastair K. Denniston, Simon Ball, Neil J. Sebire, Nigam H. Shah, Graham R. Foster, Bryan Williams, Harry Hemingway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Librarian | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,728,223
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#501
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,770
of 434,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.