↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common preventable cause of mortality in hospitalized medical patients. Despite rigorous randomized trials generating strong recommendations for anticoagulant use to prevent VTE, nearly 40% of medical patients receive inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. Knowledge-translation strategies are needed to bridge this gap.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Other 14 13%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,349,510
of 21,342,999 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,527
of 1,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,397
of 292,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#93
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,342,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.