↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The influence of long distance running on sonographic joint and tendon pathology: results from a prospective study with marathon runners

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: The influence of long distance running on sonographic joint and tendon pathology: results from a prospective study with marathon runners
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-1223-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabian Proft, Mathias Grunke, Christiane Reindl, Markus A. Schramm, Felix Mueller, Maximilian Kriegmair, Jan Leipe, Peter Weinert, Hendrik Schulze-Koops, Matthias Witt

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,192,005
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#834
of 4,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,405
of 337,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#20
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.