You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants used by Saperas community of Khetawas, Jhajjar District, Haryana, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-6-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manju Panghal, Vedpriya Arya, Sanjay Yadav, Sunil Kumar, Jaya Parkash Yadav |
| Abstract |
Plants have traditionally been used as a source of medicine in India by indigenous people of different ethnic groups inhabiting various terrains for the control of various ailments afflicting human and their domestic animals. The indigenous community of snake charmers belongs to the 'Nath' community in India have played important role of healers in treating snake bite victims. Snake charmers also sell herbal remedies for common ailments. In the present paper an attempt has been made to document on ethno botanical survey and traditional medicines used by snake charmers of village Khetawas located in district Jhajjar of Haryana, India as the little work has been made in the past to document the knowledge from this community. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Mauritius | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 25% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,850,231
of 23,804,762 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#336
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,243
of 169,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.