↓ Skip to main content

The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Critical Care, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Curry, Sally Hopewell, Carolyn Dorée, Chris Hyde, Karim Brohi, Simon Stanworth

Abstract

Worldwide, trauma is a leading cause of death and disability. Haemorrhage is responsible for up to 40% of trauma deaths. Recent strategies to improve mortality rates have focused on optimal methods of early hemorrhage control and correction of coagulopathy. We undertook a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) which evaluated trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock within the first 24 hours of injury and appraised how the interventions affected three outcomes: bleeding and/or transfusion requirements; correction of trauma induced coagulopathy and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 275 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 18%
Other 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Student > Master 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 60%
Engineering 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 69 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,639,674
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,446
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,469
of 119,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.