You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Official statistics and claims data records indicate non-response and recall bias within survey-based estimates of health care utilization in the older population
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthias Hunger, Larissa Schwarzkopf, Margit Heier, Annette Peters, Rolf Holle, KORA Study Group |
Abstract |
The validity of survey-based health care utilization estimates in the older population has been poorly researched. Owing to data protection legislation and a great number of different health care insurance providers, the assessment of recall and non-response bias is challenging to impossible in many countries. The objective of our study was to compare estimates from a population-based study in older German adults with external secondary data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
Researcher | 11 | 22% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,364,855
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,388
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,825
of 286,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#67
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.