You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard M. Gunner, Mark D. Holton, David M. Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L. C. Shepard, Adam J. Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez-Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly English, Sam Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O. Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C. Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H. Bell, Nikki J. Marks, Nigel C. Bennett, Mariano H. Tonini, Hannah J. Williams, Carlos M. Duarte, Martin C. van Rooyen, Mads F. Bertelsen, Craig J. Tambling, Rory P. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Ireland | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Iraq | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,605,080
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#112
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,737
of 429,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.