↓ Skip to main content

How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9
Authors

Richard M. Gunner, Mark D. Holton, David M. Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L. C. Shepard, Adam J. Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez-Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly English, Sam Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O. Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C. Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H. Bell, Nikki J. Marks, Nigel C. Bennett, Mariano H. Tonini, Hannah J. Williams, Carlos M. Duarte, Martin C. van Rooyen, Mads F. Bertelsen, Craig J. Tambling, Rory P. Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 46%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,638,596
of 20,832,782 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#95
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,181
of 422,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,832,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.