↓ Skip to main content

Novel scanning procedure enabling the vectorization of entire rhizotron-grown root systems

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel scanning procedure enabling the vectorization of entire rhizotron-grown root systems
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Lobet, Xavier Draye

Abstract

: This paper presents an original spit-and-combine imaging procedure that enables the complete vectorization of complex root systems grown in rhizotrons. The general principle of the method is to (1) separate the root system into a small number of large pieces to reduce root overlap, (2) scan these pieces one by one, (3) analyze separate images with a root tracing software and (4) combine all tracings into a single vectorized root system. This method generates a rich dataset containing morphological, topological and geometrical information of entire root systems grown in rhizotrons. The utility of the method is illustrated with a detailed architectural analysis of a 20-day old maize root system, coupled with a spatial analysis of water uptake patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 124 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 52%
Environmental Science 15 11%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#950
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,933
of 280,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.