You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of prognostic factors in canine mammary malignant tumours: a multivariable survival study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-9-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreia A Santos, Célia C Lopes, Jorge R Ribeiro, Liliana R Martins, Joana C Santos, Irina F Amorim, Fátima Gärtner, Augusto J Matos |
| Abstract |
Although several histopathological and clinical features of canine mammary gland tumours have been widely studied from a prognostic standpoint, considerable variations in tumour individual biologic behaviour difficult the definition of accurate prognostic factors. It has been suggested that the malignant behaviour of tumours is the end result of several alterations in cellular physiology that culminate in tumour growth and spread. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine, using a multivariable model, the independent prognostic value of several immunohistochemically detected tumour-associated molecules, such as MMP-9 and uPA in stromal cells and Ki-67, TIMP-2 and VEGF in cancer cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 27% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 75 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,300,722
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#903
of 3,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,424
of 280,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#29
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.