↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in bone density measurement history and osteoporosis medication utilisation in Swiss women: results from the Swiss Health Survey 2007

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disparities in bone density measurement history and osteoporosis medication utilisation in Swiss women: results from the Swiss Health Survey 2007
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Born, Marcel Zwahlen

Abstract

Although factors associated with the utilisation of bone density measurement (BDM) and osteoporosis treatment have been regularly assessed in the US and Canada, they have not been effectively analysed in European countries. This study assessed factors associated with the utilisation of BDM and osteoporosis medication (OM) in Switzerland.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Librarian 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,077,257
of 4,507,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,161
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,770
of 283,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#109
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.