↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian additional evidence for decision making under small sample uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian additional evidence for decision making under small sample uncertainty
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01432-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjun Sondhi, Brian Segal, Jeremy Snider, Olivier Humblet, Margaret McCusker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,008,366
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,315
of 2,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,394
of 429,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#41
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.