↓ Skip to main content

Circadian light

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Circadian Rhythms, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian light
Published in
Journal of Circadian Rhythms, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1740-3391-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark S Rea, Mariana G Figueiro, Andrew Bierman, John D Bullough

Abstract

The present paper reflects a work in progress toward a definition of circadian light, one that should be informed by the thoughtful, century-old evolution of our present definition of light as a stimulus for the human visual system. This work in progress is based upon the functional relationship between optical radiation and its effects on nocturnal melatonin suppression, in large part because the basic data are available in the literature. Discussed here are the fundamental differences between responses by the visual and circadian systems to optical radiation. Brief reviews of photometry, colorimetry, and brightness perception are presented as a foundation for the discussion of circadian light. Finally, circadian light (CLA) and circadian stimulus (CS) calculation procedures based on a published mathematical model of human circadian phototransduction are presented with an example.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 274 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 19%
Researcher 56 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 26 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 13%
Design 32 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 7%
Psychology 21 7%
Other 76 26%
Unknown 45 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,453,451
of 17,745,665 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#25
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,756
of 266,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,745,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.