You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management of patients with pulmonary mycobacteriosis in France: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12890-021-01701-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascale Bemer, Olivia Peuchant, Hélène Guet-Revillet, Julien Bador, Charlotte Balavoine, Damien Basille, Guillaume Beltramo, François-Xavier Blanc, Elodie Blanchard, Sarah Boulanger, Anne Bourgoin, David Boutoille, Emmanuelle Cambau, Frédérique Canis, Didier Caparros, Anne Carricajo, Christian Carrière, Gérard Couetdic, Francis Couturaud, Jean-Charles Dalphin, Tristan Degot, Marion Desquiens, Gilles Devouassoux, Jean-Marie Duez, Oana Dumitrescu, Magali Dupuy-Grasset, Alice Gaudart, Marjolaine Georges, Cendrine Godet, Sylvain Godreuil, Aurélie Guillouzouic, Farida Hamdad-Daoudi, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud, Christelle Koebel, Aurore Lagrange, Philippe Lanotte, Sylvain Marchand-Adam, Faïza Mougari, Marlène Murris, Isabelle Patry, Michèle Pérouse de Montclos, Laurent Raskine, Karine Risso, Christine Segonds, Dominique Sicard, Dominique Terru, Anne Vachée, Jean-Michel Vergnon, Christian Martin, Frédéric Schramm, Claire Andrejak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,715,010
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#397
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,616
of 440,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#13
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.