You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of new screening tool for predicting dementia risk in community-dwelling older Japanese adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-021-03121-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keitaro Makino, Sangyoon Lee, Seongryu Bae, Ippei Chiba, Kenji Harada, Osamu Katayama, Yohei Shinkai, Hiroyuki Shimada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,863
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#703
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,546
of 439,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#15
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.