↓ Skip to main content

In Memoriam, Nathaniel M. Reichek, MD, 1941–2021

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Memoriam, Nathaniel M. Reichek, MD, 1941–2021
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12968-021-00804-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Kramer, Victor Ferrari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,259,870
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#253
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,721
of 439,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.