You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vivo performance of electrospun tubular hyaluronic acid/collagen nanofibrous scaffolds for vascular reconstruction in the rabbit model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01091-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuqing Niu, Massimiliano Galluzzi, Ming Fu, Jinhua Hu, Huimin Xia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 4 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#524
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,530
of 439,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#45
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.