You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Predictors for participation in DNA self-sampling of childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
Nicolas Waespe, Sven Strebel, Denis Marino, Veneranda Mattiello, Fanny Muet, Tiago Nava, Christina Schindera, Fabien N. Belle, Luzius Mader, Adrian Spoerri, Claudia E. Kuehni, Marc Ansari
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||5||33%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||27%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||7%|
|Sports and Recreations||1||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 439,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.