↓ Skip to main content

Efficient and equitable HIV prevention: A case study of male circumcision in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient and equitable HIV prevention: A case study of male circumcision in South Africa
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Verguet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Social Sciences 9 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,997,643
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#222
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,880
of 288,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them