You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low vitamin D levels do not aggravate COVID-19 risk or death, and vitamin D supplementation does not improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of cohort studies and RCTs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00744-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Chen, Kaibo Mei, Lixia Xie, Ping Yuan, Jianyong Ma, Peng Yu, Wengen Zhu, Chunhua Zheng, Xiao Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 291 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 27 | 9% |
| Germany | 18 | 6% |
| United States | 17 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 5% |
| Canada | 12 | 4% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 3 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 155 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 254 | 87% |
| Scientists | 18 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 309. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#112,910
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#49
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,063
of 444,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.