You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01437-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonard Ho, Fiona Y. T. Ke, Charlene H. L. Wong, Irene X. Y. Wu, Andy K. L. Cheung, Chen Mao, Vincent C. H. Chung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,931,216
of 24,618,075 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#259
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,964
of 432,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.