You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recurrent insertion and duplication generate networks of transposable element sequences in the Drosophila melanogaster genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-r112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Casey M Bergman, Hadi Quesneville, Dominique Anxolabéhère, Michael Ashburner |
| Abstract |
The recent availability of genome sequences has provided unparalleled insights into the broad-scale patterns of transposable element (TE) sequences in eukaryotic genomes. Nevertheless, the difficulties that TEs pose for genome assembly and annotation have prevented detailed, quantitative inferences about the contribution of TEs to genomes sequences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 30% |
| Researcher | 29 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,306
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,296
of 168,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.