You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael G. Wilson, Sandy Oliver, G. J. Melendez-Torres, John N. Lavis, Kerry Waddell, Kelly Dickson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Librarian | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,020,266
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#136
of 2,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,672
of 435,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.