You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-7922-8-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Sartelli, Pierluigi Viale, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Ernest Moore, Mark Malangoni, Frederick A Moore, George Velmahos, Raul Coimbra, Rao Ivatury, Andrew Peitzman, Kaoru Koike, Ari Leppaniemi, Walter Biffl, Clay Cothren Burlew, Zsolt J Balogh, Ken Boffard, Cino Bendinelli, Sanjay Gupta, Yoram Kluger, Ferdinando Agresta, Salomone Di Saverio, Imtiaz Wani, Alex Escalona, Carlos Ordonez, Gustavo P Fraga, Gerson Alves Pereira, Miklosh Bala, Yunfeng Cui, Sanjay Marwah, Boris Sakakushev, Victor Kong, Noel Naidoo, Adamu Ahmed, Ashraf Abbas, Gianluca Guercioni, Nereo Vettoretto, Rafael Díaz-Nieto, Ihor Gerych, Cristian Tranà, Mario Paulo Faro, Kuo-Ching Yuan, Kenneth Yuh Yen Kok, Alain Chichom Mefire, JaeGil Lee, Suk-Kyung Hong, Wagih Ghnnam, Boonying Siribumrungwong, Norio Sato, Kiyoshi Murata, Takayuki Irahara, Federico Coccolini, Helmut A Segovia Lohse, Alfredo Verni, Tomohisa Shoko |
| Abstract |
Despite advances in diagnosis, surgery, and antimicrobial therapy, mortality rates associated with complicated intra-abdominal infections remain exceedingly high.The 2013 update of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of intra-abdominal infections contains evidence-based recommendations for management of patients with intra-abdominal infections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 407 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 66 | 16% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 105 | 25% |
| Unknown | 78 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 265 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Unknown | 93 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,308,455
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#141
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,951
of 295,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them