You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in perceptions and fast food eating behaviours between Indians living in high- and low-income neighbourhoods of Chandigarh, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Robert Aloia, Danijela Gasevic, Salim Yusuf, Koon Teo, Arun Chockalingam, Binod Kumar Patro, Rajesh Kumar, Scott Alexander Lear |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,345,428
of 24,074,860 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,187
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,130
of 289,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,074,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.