↓ Skip to main content

Increasing utilization of Internet-based resources following efforts to promote evidence-based medicine: a national study in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing utilization of Internet-based resources following efforts to promote evidence-based medicine: a national study in Taiwan
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Hao Weng, Ken N Kuo, Chun-Yuh Yang, Heng-Lien Lo, Ya-Hui Shih, Chiehfeng Chen, Ya-Wen Chiu

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2007, the National Health Research Institutes has been promoting the dissemination of evidence-based medicine (EBM). The current study examined longitudinal trends of behaviors in how hospital-based physicians and nurses have searched for medical information during the spread of EBM.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,978,916
of 13,876,145 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#471
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,672
of 251,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#63
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,876,145 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.