You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Progressive myocardial injury in myotonic dystrophy type II and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance follow-up study
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, November 2021
Edyta Blaszczyk, Carolin Lim, Peter Kellman, Luisa Schmacht, Jan Gröschel, Simone Spuler, Jeanette Schulz-Menger
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||30%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 429,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.