↓ Skip to main content

Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40814-021-00939-4
Authors

Salem A. Alkaabi, Diandra Sabrina Natsir Kalla, Ghamdan A. Alsabri, Abul Fauzi, Nova Jansen, Andi Tajrin, Rifaat Nurrahma, Werner Müller, Heinz C. Schröder, Wang Xiaohong, Tymour Forouzanfar, Marco N. Helder, Muhammad Ruslin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#17,014,953
of 21,084,186 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#714
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,913
of 420,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#138
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,084,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.