↓ Skip to main content

Use of external evidence for design and Bayesian analysis of clinical trials: a qualitative study of trialists’ views

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of external evidence for design and Bayesian analysis of clinical trials: a qualitative study of trialists’ views
Published in
Trials, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05759-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma L. Clayton, Daisy Elliott, Julian P. T. Higgins, Hayley E. Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Other 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Mathematics 1 25%
Materials Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,560,067
of 21,131,454 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,414
of 5,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,244
of 420,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#283
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,131,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.