You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic variations associated with renal disease uncovered by parallel metabolomics of urine and serum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-6-s1-s14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xianfu Gao, Wanjia Chen, Rongxia Li, Minfeng Wang, Chunlei Chen, Rong Zeng, Yueyi Deng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#657
of 1,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,994
of 179,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#30
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.