You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Conklin, Elizabeth Lusk, Megan Harris, Paul Stolee |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this paper is to describe and reflect on the role of knowledge brokers (KBs) in the Seniors Health Research Transfer Network (SHRTN). The paper reviews the relevant literature on knowledge brokering, and then describes the evolving role of knowledge brokering in this knowledge network. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Kenya | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,058,797
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#406
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,133
of 290,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.