↓ Skip to main content

Propionic acidemia: clinical course and outcome in 55 pediatric and adolescent patients

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propionic acidemia: clinical course and outcome in 55 pediatric and adolescent patients
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah C Grünert, Stephanie Müllerleile, Linda De Silva, Michael Barth, Melanie Walter, Kerstin Walter, Thomas Meissner, Martin Lindner, Regina Ensenauer, René Santer, Olaf A Bodamer, Matthias R Baumgartner, Michaela Brunner-Krainz, Daniela Karall, Claudia Haase, Ina Knerr, Thorsten Marquardt, Julia B Hennermann, Robert Steinfeld, Skadi Beblo, Hans-Georg Koch, Vassiliki Konstantopoulou, Sabine Scholl-Bürgi, Agnes van Teeffelen-Heithoff, Terttu Suormala, Wolfgang Sperl, Jan P Kraus, Andrea Superti-Furga, Karl Otfried Schwab, Jörn Oliver Sass

Abstract

Propionic acidemia is an inherited disorder caused by deficiency of propionyl-CoA carboxylase. Although it is one of the most frequent organic acidurias, information on the outcome of affected individuals is still limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#12,576,218
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,181
of 2,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,742
of 282,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#57
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.