↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12885-021-08938-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiang Wang, Shijing Wei, Shuai Li, Jie Yu, Guohua Zhang, Cheng Ni, Li Sun, Hui Zheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 19 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,418
of 8,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,807
of 392,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#111
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.