↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a novel dark-blood delayed enhancement technique for the detection of papillary muscle scar

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a novel dark-blood delayed enhancement technique for the detection of papillary muscle scar
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-18-s1-q6
Authors

Dave Wendell, Elizabeth Jenista, Wolfgang G Rehwald, Han W Kim, Michele Parker, Enn-Ling Chen, Robert Judd, Raymond Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,456,753
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#441
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,992
of 406,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.