↓ Skip to main content

Childhood lead exposure in France: benefit estimation and partial cost-benefit analysis of lead hazard control

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Childhood lead exposure in France: benefit estimation and partial cost-benefit analysis of lead hazard control
Published in
Environmental Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-10-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Céline Pichery, Martine Bellanger, Denis Zmirou-Navier, Philippe Glorennec, Philippe Hartemann, Philippe Grandjean

Abstract

Lead exposure remains a public health concern due to its serious adverse effects, such as cognitive and behavioral impairment: children younger than six years of age being the most vulnerable population. In Europe, the lead-related economic impacts have not been examined in detail. We estimate the annual costs in France due to childhood exposure and, through a cost benefit analysis (CBA), aim to assess the expected social and economic benefits of exposure abatement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,030,184
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#225
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,120
of 111,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.