↓ Skip to main content

Dietary, anthropometric, and biochemical determinants of uric acid in free-living adults

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary, anthropometric, and biochemical determinants of uric acid in free-living adults
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erick Prado de Oliveira, Fernando Moreto, Liciana Vaz de Arruda Silveira, Roberto Carlos Burini

Abstract

High plasma uric acid (UA) is a prerequisite for gout and is also associated with the metabolic syndrome and its components and consequently risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Hence, the management of UA serum concentrations would be essential for the treatment and/or prevention of human diseases and, to that end, it is necessary to know what the main factors that control the uricemia increase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the main factors associated with higher uricemia values analyzing diet, body composition and biochemical markers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 27 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,070,986
of 21,342,999 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,020
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,263
of 293,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#86
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,342,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.