↓ Skip to main content

Brain activity underlying auditory perceptual learning during short period training: simultaneous fMRI and EEG recording

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain activity underlying auditory perceptual learning during short period training: simultaneous fMRI and EEG recording
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-14-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Cláudia Silva de Souza, Hani Camille Yehia, Masa-aki Sato, Daniel Callan

Abstract

There is an accumulating body of evidence indicating that neuronal functional specificity to basic sensory stimulation is mutable and subject to experience. Although fMRI experiments have investigated changes in brain activity after relative to before perceptual learning, brain activity during perceptual learning has not been explored. This work investigated brain activity related to auditory frequency discrimination learning using a variational Bayesian approach for source localization, during simultaneous EEG and fMRI recording. We investigated whether the practice effects are determined solely by activity in stimulus-driven mechanisms or whether high-level attentional mechanisms, which are linked to the perceptual task, control the learning process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 115 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 30%
Neuroscience 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Engineering 9 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,207,446
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#621
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,915
of 291,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.