↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis, motivation, and life satisfaction in an internet sample

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 739)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabis, motivation, and life satisfaction in an internet sample
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-1-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Smucker Barnwell, Mitch Earleywine, Rand Wilcox

Abstract

Although little evidence supports cannabis-induced amotivational syndrome, sources continue to assert that the drug saps motivation 1, which may guide current prohibitions. Few studies report low motivation in chronic users; another reveals that they have higher subjective wellbeing. To assess differences in motivation and subjective wellbeing, we used a large sample (N = 487) and strict definitions of cannabis use (7 days/week) and abstinence (never). Standard statistical techniques showed no differences. Robust statistical methods controlling for heteroscedasticity, non-normality and extreme values found no differences in motivation but a small difference in subjective wellbeing. Medical users of cannabis reporting health problems tended to account for a significant portion of subjective wellbeing differences, suggesting that illness decreased wellbeing. All p-values were above p = .05. Thus, daily use of cannabis does not impair motivation. Its impact on subjective wellbeing is small and may actually reflect lower wellbeing due to medical symptoms rather than actual consumption of the plant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Unspecified 10 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Unspecified 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#440,347
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#17
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#832
of 169,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them