You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting respiratory failure in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 by admission sex-specific biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Sex Differences, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13293-021-00407-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Teresa Pagano, Daniela Peruzzu, Luca Busani, Marina Pierdominici, Anna Ruggieri, Andrea Antinori, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Nicola Petrosillo, Fabrizio Palmieri, Pierluca Piselli, Stefania Cicalini, Stefania Notari, Emanuele Nicastri, Chiara Agrati, Giuseppe Ippolito, Francesco Vaia, Maria Cristina Gagliardi, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Elena Ortona |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 35% |
| Panama | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,281,689
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Sex Differences
#101
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,307
of 517,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Sex Differences
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.