↓ Skip to main content

Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-12-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, Payam Dadvand, James Grellier, David Martinez, Martine Vrijheid

Abstract

Various epidemiological studies have suggested associations between environmental exposures and pregnancy outcomes. Some studies have tempted to combine information from various epidemiological studies using meta-analysis. We aimed to describe the methodologies used in these recent meta-analyses of environmental exposures and pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, we aimed to report their main findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 280 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 54 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 30%
Environmental Science 33 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 73 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,289,173
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#272
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,978
of 311,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.