↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of mortality risk evaluation tools efficacy in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of mortality risk evaluation tools efficacy in critically ill COVID-19 patients
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12879-021-06866-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vaidas Vicka, Elija Januskeviciute, Sigute Miskinyte, Donata Ringaitiene, Mindaugas Serpytis, Andrius Klimasauskas, Ligita Jancoriene, Jurate Sipylaite

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Unspecified 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Unspecified 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,262,553
of 22,609,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,532
of 7,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,080
of 523,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#587
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,609,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.