↓ Skip to main content

Ethno-entomological observations from North Korea (officially known as the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethno-entomological observations from North Korea (officially known as the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

V Benno Meyer-Rochow

Abstract

In terms of scientific activities generally and ethnobiological pursuits in particular, North Korea, officially known as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is an almost blank entity on the quilt of global research. During a sabbatical semester at Pyongyang University of Science and Technology the author used this opportunity to gather some information on the uses of insect and other terrestrial arthropods as human food and components of traditional healing methods in that country. Despite the widely publicised shortcomings in the supply of food stuffs to the population of North Korea, insects are not generally seen as a source of food worthy of exploitation. However, the therapeutic use of insects, centipedes and scorpions to treat illnesses as diverse as the common cold, skin rashes, constipation, dysentery, nervous prostration, whooping cough, osteomyelitis, tetanus, and various forms of cancer is apparently still popular. The arthropods used therapeutically are credited with anti-inflammatory, immunological and other health-promoting effects, because they are said to contain hormones, steroids, lipids and plant-derived alkaloids, all of which capable of exerting their effects on the human body.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,674,538
of 23,810,331 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#245
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,515
of 289,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,810,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.