You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver C Ezechi, Chidinma V Gab-Okafor, Per Olof Ostergren, Karen Odberg Pettersson |
| Abstract |
The proven benefit of integrating cervical cancer screening programme into HIV care has led to its adoption as a standard of care. However this is not operational in most HIV clinics in Nigeria. Of the various reasons given for non-implementation, none is backed by scientific evidence. This study was conducted to assess the willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 70 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,422,524
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,831
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,936
of 284,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#139
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.