↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of digital adherence technology with differentiated care to support tuberculosis treatment adherence and improve treatment outcomes in Ethiopia: a study…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of digital adherence technology with differentiated care to support tuberculosis treatment adherence and improve treatment outcomes in Ethiopia: a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12879-021-06833-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amare W. Tadesse, Zemedu Mohammed, Nicola Foster, Matthew Quaife, Christopher Finn McQuaid, Jens Levy, Kristian van Kalmthout, Job van Rest, Degu Jerene, Tofik Abdurhman, Hiwot Yazew, Demekech G. Umeta, Demelash Assefa, Gedion T. Weldemichael, Ahmed Bedru, Taye Letta, Katherine L. Fielding

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Unspecified 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 51 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Unspecified 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 52 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,315,440
of 25,077,376 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,129
of 8,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,726
of 432,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#31
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,077,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.